Mysticism, whether atheistic or otherwise, has always welcomed a spectrum of experiences valued primarily for their absurdity and futility. The experience of asemic writing, whether one is attempting to write it or attempting to read it, is fundamentally a mystical experience. It is The Face That Is No Face, the Via Negativa.
Let’s say I make a sequence of tangled squiggles, with baggy loops here, jagged-edged bulges there, poncruated with curatorial punctuation marks in the form of randomly tilted ascenders and descenders, moving suggestively from left to right on the foundation of an imaginary baseline. It looks like writing, but we can’t read it, says the entry at Wikipedia. It must be asemic writing, says a contextualized leap of faith.
What if it is, in theory and in practice, experientially, a kind of quasi-calligraphic drawing?
This is not the Via Negativa. It is direct experience of the mystery. Direct Experience of The Mystery. There is no wrong reading, judged and condemned by official authorities on the matter. There are no Official Authorities on the matter. And there is no range of acceptable interpretations of the experience, no spectrum of permitted discourse about the acceptable interpretations.
There is no attempt at reading, not of any variety, and therefore there is no writing, of any variety, asemic or otherwise.
Asemic writing, in its absolute failure to exist, can function in our lives as a kind of pagan spiritual discipline, one designed to give us greater access to the experience of experience.
Archivi categoria: scrittura asemantica
‘buzdokuz’, issue #12, is now out
featuring:
as ex. asemic expressionism, or abstract expressionist writing / jim leftwich. 2022
Once upon a time, long long ago (20 years), in a far far away place (Charlottesville, VA), I claimed to have identified a category of visual poetry called (perhaps only by me) Decorative Expressionism. It was busy, crowded, colorful and noisy. I liked it a lot — for several reasons, one of them being the fact that I was making quite a bit of it myself.
If anyone had asked me at the time (no one has ever asked me), I would have told them that Decorative Expressionism was the exact opposite of asemic writing.
Ah yes, time goes by and with a little “luck of the research and reading” (recollected and ruminated upon in tranquility) maybe we learn a thing or two. How does that old hit single go?
What I didn’t know then
What I don’t know now
.. some other stuff in there, I know… 45 years ago… anyway
I would have been wrong.
That was back in the early days of this current iteration of asemic writing, when some of us still thought the prefix ‘a-‘ meant “without; not having any.” Little did we know that the prefix ‘a-‘ was soon to take on the meaning of its opposite, “poly-“. “Without, not having any” semes came to mean “having many” semes. “Absolutely thwarting the production of meaning” became “open to the invention of all imaginable meanings.”
It was a transformative moment in the history of all things asemic.
When Jackson Pollock woke up in the morning, he already had a lit cigarette balanced on his lower lip. He visited his Jungian therapist every Tuesday at 2pm. They played chess, drank beer, went to Yankees games, and chased the stately, plump pigeons through Central Park.
You’re getting better, Jack, said the Jungian therapist. Getting better all the time.
Thank you, said Jackson Pollock.
Alchemy of the vowels, Tantric Sex Mandala, said the Jungian therapist.
I don’t believe in The Accident, said Jackson Pollock.
He walked down the crowded sidewalk past The Tavern to his studio.
He lit a cigarette, opened a beer, took off his shoes and socks.
He spent the rest of the evening working, late into the night, doing The Dance of the Collective Unconscious, In The Painting.
That’s pretty much how asemic writing is still made today.
So, the next time someone tells you myriad hymnal nightpoets, hurrier, nebula nebula, tell them you know all about asemic expressionism. Maybe they’re living in a book by Donald Barthelme. What do you know? Empathy is all about effort. Let there be no bullshit between Practitioners of The Craft and Sullen Art.
post-asemic press is listed at “poets & writers magazine”
“womb: opere dall’archivio utsanga”: @ fasano (br) dal 2 al 13 giugno
“Womb. Opere dall’Archivio Utsanga” | Mostra promossa e curata da Clotilde Palasciano
Museo della casa alla fasanese | via Fogazzaro 4, Fasano (BR)
dal 2 al 13 giugno 2022
In mostra opere di Mariangela Guatteri, Fabio Lapiana, Giovanni Fontana, David Felix, Tim Gaze, Lucinda Sherlock, Cristiano Caggiula, Francesco Aprile, Egidio Marullo, Marco Giovenale, Giuseppe Calandriello, Ásgrimur Kuldaboli Pórhallsson, Lina Stern, Vittore Baroni, Dona Mayoora, Luc Fierens, Eugenio Lucrezi, Kerri Pullo, Hilda Paz, Reed Altemus, Clemente Padin, Giancarlo Pavanello, Clotilde Palasciano, Miriam Midley, Cheryl Penn, Francesco Saverio Dòdaro, Enzo Miglietta, Ruggero Maggi, Rafael Gonzalez, Vittorio Fava, Vittorino Curci, Kenryo Hara, Gino Gini, Fernanda Fedi, Oronzo Liuzzi, Adriano Accattino, Enzo Patti, Anna Boschi, Cecelia Chapman-Jeff Crouch, Giuseppe Pellegrino.
Alcune immagini dalla mostra qui: https://www.facebook.com/francesco.aprile3/posts/pfbid02Q48KwJBattpBGbykRQYE5xzWpe9kELtneXiAWVWrjU2NBtL2XTov9X6ov89pBkYgl
untitled / differx. 2022
oggi, h. 20:15, intervista online a mg per “incontri all’isolotto”
Oggi, sulla pagina fb https://www.facebook.com/peter.genito, alle ore 20:15, Peter Genito, nella serie degli “incontri all’isolotto” organizzati dall’Arci, dal Centro per il libro e la lettura, nel contesto del Maggio dei libri e del LetturaDay, intervista Marco Giovenale su scritture di ricerca, prosa in prosa, materiali installativi, per quanto riguarda il
versante della letteratura; e sull’asemic writing per quanto attiene al versante artistico / visivo.