https://www.facebook.com/reel/559351303017930?s=yWDuG2&fs=e
.
a few optophonetics / verbosonics excerpts from an incredibly rich fascicle (with works by —among others— van Doesburg, Houédard, Chopin, Rühm, Mon, Lora-Totino, Ladik, and a very long interview to Bob Cobbing).
visual-poetry.tumblr.com/post/164221946826/by-stefan-br%C3%BCggemann
…ma ‘invece’, che cos’è un’installance? (termine che ho coniato nel 2010)
cfr. https://medium.com/repository/installance-aug-23rd-2010-755e30d8e3ba
ovvero (originariamente) https://installance.blogspot.com/p/host-lost-derive-river-01.html
e anche
https://operavivamagazine.org/installance/
recentemente, Johannes Bjerg: https://slowforward.net/2021/06/03/drawing-an-eye-on-a-stone-so-it-can-see-the-sky-johannes-s-h-bjerg-2021/.
ipotesi di prossimità: l’installance come opera abbandonata e persa (differx) secondo la lezione dei Sassi nel Tevere, di Emilio Villa (1949), e l’opera che si realizza quando manca, come nelle “zone di sensibilità pittorica immateriale” di Yves Klein (1957: cfr. il dattiloscritto delle Règles rituelles de la cession des zones de sensibilité picturale immatérielle, qui ovvero qui), o nella auto-destructive art di Gustav Metzger, o nel cubo nel cilindro invisibile di Gino De Dominicis (1969: terza foto in questa sequenza); o quando è distrutta ed eventualmente ‘recuperata’ in frammenti, cfr. Jean Tinguely (Homage to New York, 1960), e John Baldessari (Cremation Project, 1970); o infine irrecuperabile (Robert Barry, 1969).
poi ecco la dichiarazione di Stefan Brüggemann, sopra mostrata; ma è utile ricordare anche il lavoro di Cesare Pietroiusti, prima di Banksy. oppure le azioni di Angelo Pretolani, come quelle incluse nella serie Sotto il selciato c’è la spiaggia.
Klein:
§
De Dominicis:
§
Tinguely:
https://www.moma.org/calendar/exhibitions/3369
https://assets.moma.org/documents/moma_press-release_326185.pdf
“[…] During its brief operation, a meteorological trial balloon inflated and burst, colored smoke was discharged, paintings were made and destroyed, and bottles crashed to the ground […]”
(https://www.moma.org/collection/works/81174)
§
Metzger:
& (most of all):
Gustav Metzger : “Auto-Destructive Art” (1965, H. Liversidge)
§
Baldessari:
§
Pretolani:
§
sull’argomento cfr. anche:
– Burning Man, operazione collettiva del 1986, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burning_Man
– https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/11/t-magazine/artists-destroy-past-work.html
– http://www.unclosed.eu/rubriche/osservatorio/recensioni-attualita/171-la-didascalia-mancante.html
– https://slowforward.net/2011/12/11/alighiero-boetti-2/
§
Guarda che siamo di Eleusi. […] Qui il più severo e il più vero inventore sono io, che ho inventato la poesia distrutta, data in pasto sacrificale alla Dispersione, all’Annichilimento: sono il solo che ha buttato il meglio che ha fatto: quello che s’è consumato nella tasca di dietro dei calzoni scappando di qua e di là, quello scritto sui sassi buttati a Tevere, quello stampato da un tipografo che non c’è più, quello lasciato in una camera di via della croce. Solo così si poteva andare oltre la pagina bianca: con la pagina annientata.
Emilio Villa, da un appunto (“risalente alla fine degli anni Settanta o all’inizio degli Ottanta”, cfr. A.Tagliaferri, Il clandestino. Vita e opere di Emilio Villa, DeriveApprodi, Roma 2004, p. 183)
§
§
“E nel 1980, avendo esposto in una galleria di Brescia le mûra di t;éb;é (poesie scritte in greco antico su lastre di plexiglas), [Emilio Villa] ha tagliuzzato i testi della sua traduzione in italiano e ne ha messo i frammenti entro sacchetti che poi ha appeso accanto alle lastre. Dunque ha scritto in una lingua morta, ha tradotto in una lingua stentatamente viva, e ha esposto la morta, la lingua impossibile, nascondendo sotto gli occhi di tutti la viva, facendo tornare indietro il senso di quelle parole, impedendole a noi, lasciando ogni cosa inascoltata”.
Nanni Cagnone, in Cognizione di Emilio Villa [1989],
in Emilio Villa poeta e scrittore, a cura di Claudio
Parmiggiani, Milano, Mazzotta, 2008, p. 336
§
*
«Beyond self, auto-destructive art entails a loss of the artist’s ego»
(Manjinder Sidhu on Gustav Metzger,
https://www.a-n.co.uk/reviews/gustav-metzger-towards-auto-destructive-art/)
Artists from all over the world responded to an open-call for performance concepts that explore the balance between public/private spaces and expected/unexpected behavior.
the Pictura art space in the town of Dordrecht. During this event, we will hold a panel discussion on ‘Unnoticed Art’, and present some re-enactments of several festival performances.
A book on ‘Unnoticed Art’ will be distributed on the day, containing all the performance concepts that were put into action, along with the experiences of each performer. The book will also include an essay on the subject of ‘Unnoticed Art’, written by Dutch artist and festival director, Frans van Lent.
Although there will be no recordings made of the Unnoticed Art Festival – we will be making a video recording of the panel discussion, and making this available on the festival website.
One crisp March morning in 1969, artist Paul van Hoeydonck was visiting his Manhattan gallery when he stumbled into the middle of a startling conversation. Louise Tolliver Deutschman, the gallery’s director, was making an energetic pitch to Dick Waddell, the owner. “Why don’t we put a sculpture of Paul’s on the moon,” she insisted. Before Waddell could reply, van Hoeydonck inserted himself into the exchange: “Are you completely nuts? How would we even do it?”Deutschman stood her ground. “I don’t know,” she replied, “but I’ll figure out a way.”She did.At 12:18 a.m. Greenwich Mean Time on Aug. 2, 1971, Commander David Scott of Apollo 15 placed a 3 1/2-inch-tall aluminum sculpture onto the dusty surface of a small crater near his parked lunar rover. At that moment the moon transformed from an airless ball of rock into the largest exhibition space in the known universe. Scott regarded the moment as tribute to the heroic astronauts and cosmonauts who had given their lives in the space race. Van Hoeydonck was thrilled that his art was pointing the way to a human destiny beyond Earth and expected that he would soon be “bigger than Picasso.”In reality, van Hoeydonck’s lunar sculpture, called Fallen Astronaut, inspired not celebration but scandal. Within three years, Waddell’s gallery had gone bankrupt. Scott was hounded by a congressional investigation and left NASA on shaky terms. Van Hoeydonck, accused of profiteering from the public space program, retreated to a modest career in his native Belgium. Now both in their 80s, Scott and van Hoeydonck still see themselves unfairly maligned in blogs and Wikipedia pages—to the extent that Fallen Astronaut is remembered at all.And yet, the spirit of Fallen Astronaut is more relevant today than ever. Google is promoting a $30 million prize for private adventurers to send robots to the moon in the next few years; companies such as SpaceX and Virgin Galactic are creating a new for-profit infrastructure of human spaceflight; and David Scott is grooming Brown University undergrads to become the next generation of cosmic adventurers.Governments come and go, public sentiment waxes and wanes, but the dream of reaching to the stars lives on. Fallen Astronaut does, too, hanging eternally 238,000 miles above our heads. Here, for the first time, we tell the full, tangled tale behind one of the smallest yet most extraordinary achievements of the Space Age.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tr3OWkqppeM&w=460&h=325]